Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Amperity Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Amperity Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These cases are split between 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners, indicating that each of the company's active applications is being handled independently. This distribution shows that even with a very small number of cases, the company's software innovations are being reviewed in different technical groups at the office.

VY, HUNG T is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. With only 2 pending office actions total, the workload is evenly divided among the 2 distinct examiners. This structure requires the company to navigate 2 different art units for its 2 pending office actions. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution of these two cases will be entirely separate, with no overlap in examiners or art units. Each of the 2 distinct examiners will bring their own perspective to the review process, which may lead to different timelines and outcomes for the company's software-related patent filings. The company must manage two independent prosecution tracks for its small portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (33%)
§101 + other2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORRISON, JAY A 1 81.1% +23.3%
VY, HUNG T 1 86.3% +2.4%
GOLAN, MATTHEW BRYCE 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17511946 GENERATING AFFINITY GROUPS WITH MULTINOMIAL CLASSIFICATION AND BAYESIAN RANKING GOLAN, MATTHEW BRYCE 30d overdue
19392704 MATCHING DATABASE RECORD IDENTITY THROUGH INTELLIGENT LABELING MORRISON, JAY A —
19240505 QUERY RUNTIME FOR MULTI-LAYER COMPOSITION OF QUERIES VY, HUNG T —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19392704 MATCHING DATABASE RECORD IDENTITY THROUGH INTELLIGENT LABELING MORRISON, JAY A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2161 1
2163 1
2123 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19392704 MATCHING DATABASE RECORD IDENTITY THROUGH INTELLIGENT LABELING MORRISON, JAY A 2161 §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2025
19240505 QUERY RUNTIME FOR MULTI-LAYER COMPOSITION OF QUERIES VY, HUNG T 2163 §101Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2025
17511946 GENERATING AFFINITY GROUPS WITH MULTINOMIAL CLASSIFICATION AND BAYESIAN RANKING GOLAN, MATTHEW BRYCE 2123 §101§103 Final Rejection 30d overdue Pending Oct 27, 2021

Managing Amperity Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Amperity Inc. have?

Amperity Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Amperity Inc. applications?

Jay A Morrison has the most, with 1 of Amperity Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Amperity Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month