Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

AMS-OSRAM AG

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

AMS-OSRAM AG maintains 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating a lack of examiner overlap in the current prosecution pipeline. This distribution requires the applicant to navigate different sets of examiner preferences simultaneously.

The busiest examiner, MENEFEE, JAMES A, is responsible for 1 pending office action. This workload is part of the total 2 pending office actions for the portfolio. With 2 distinct art units involved, the prosecution strategy must account for the specific procedural nuances of each unit to ensure consistent outcomes across the active applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MENEFEE, JAMES A 1 78.9% +12.1%
CHILTON, CLARA GRACE 1 54.5% +12.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18546299 Meta-optics Integrated on VCSELs MENEFEE, JAMES A —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18546299 Meta-optics Integrated on VCSELs MENEFEE, JAMES A —
17781968 TIME OF FLIGHT SENSING METHOD CHILTON, CLARA GRACE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2828 1
3645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18546299 Meta-optics Integrated on VCSELs MENEFEE, JAMES A 2828 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2023
17781968 TIME OF FLIGHT SENSING METHOD CHILTON, CLARA GRACE 3645 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 02, 2022

Managing AMS-OSRAM AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month