Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Amsilk GmbH is prosecuting a portfolio in Chemistry & Materials with 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This reflects a focused effort to protect chemical or material science innovations within a specific technical group at the patent office, which can lead to a direct examination process.
ROBITAILLE, JOHN P is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently managing the 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is concentrated. The company's primary goal is to satisfy the specific technical requirements of this single examiner to move the pending application toward issuance. By focusing all efforts on this 1 pending office action, the applicant can effectively address the examiner's concerns within the 1 distinct art unit, streamlining the path to securing intellectual property rights.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | 1 | 62.6% | +22.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18834760 | GRADIENT PRINTING RESERVOIR AND PRINTING METHOD | ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18834760 | GRADIENT PRINTING RESERVOIR AND PRINTING METHOD | ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1743 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18834760 | GRADIENT PRINTING RESERVOIR AND PRINTING METHOD | ROBITAILLE, JOHN P | 1743 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial