Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has 3 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 3 pending matters is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution shows no consolidation of cases under any single examiner. This decentralized approach means that the company's pharmaceutical innovations are subject to the individual interpretations of 3 different examiners, requiring a flexible prosecution strategy for each application.

The company's matters are spread across 2 distinct art units. With 3 pending office actions, the work is concentrated within 2 specialized divisions of the patent office. This presence in 2 art units indicates that the company's pharmaceutical innovations fall into a narrow range of technical classifications. The ratio of 3 actions to 2 art units shows that the company's filings are technically focused, allowing for a more specialized examination process within those specific groups of the patent office.

DAVID PAUL BOWLES is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. As all 3 distinct examiners are managing exactly 1 action each, the workload is uniform across the 3 pending matters. The management of 3 pending actions in 2 art units reflects the company's current patent activity. This balanced distribution across 3 examiners and 2 art units highlights the focused nature of the company's ongoing research and development efforts in the biotechnology sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BOWLES, DAVID PAUL 1 72.7% +22.4%
VALLE, ERNESTO 1 65.8% +32.9%
BEANE, RANDALL L 1 32.8% +36.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17285039 AVEXITIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERINSULINEMIC HYPOGLYCEMIA BEANE, RANDALL L —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18372753 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS VALLE, ERNESTO 34d
19420848 TREATMENT OF POST-BARIATRIC HYPOGLYCEMIA BOWLES, DAVID PAUL —
17285039 AVEXITIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERINSULINEMIC HYPOGLYCEMIA BEANE, RANDALL L —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1654 2
1623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19420848 TREATMENT OF POST-BARIATRIC HYPOGLYCEMIA BOWLES, DAVID PAUL 1654 §103DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 16, 2025
18372753 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS VALLE, ERNESTO 1623 §103Other Non-Final OA 34d Pending Sep 26, 2023
17285039 AVEXITIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF HYPERINSULINEMIC HYPOGLYCEMIA BEANE, RANDALL L 1654 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 13, 2021

Managing Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month