Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Anasphere, Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Both of these actions are handled by 1 distinct examiner and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a highly concentrated prosecution strategy where all current activity is being reviewed by the same individual in a single technical group. Such concentration can lead to consistent feedback across the company's pending applications.
FELTON, AILEEN BAKER is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 2 pending office actions. This accounts for the total pending volume currently in the portfolio. Because all activity is within 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution is currently confined to a single specialized group within the patent office. This streamlined approach allows the company to focus its efforts on the specific examination standards of one art unit and one examiner, potentially simplifying the response process for the 2 pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | 1 | 51.9% | +16.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18543210 | BONDED THERMITE COMPOSITION | FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18543210 | BONDED THERMITE COMPOSITION | FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1734 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18543210 | BONDED THERMITE COMPOSITION | FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | 1734 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Dec 18, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial