Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ancestry.com Operations Inc.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Communications

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ancestry.com Operations Inc. has 7 pending office actions in Communications. The matters involve 7 examiners across 6 art units, showing complete examiner dispersion with limited technical-unit overlap.

DEPALMA, CAROLINE ELIZABETH is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending action. The docket is best handled through matter-specific response planning and centralized deadline oversight.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (57%)
2
Medium (29%)
1
Easy (14%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
29% of docket
5
Communications
71% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DEPALMA, CAROLINE ELIZABETH 1 90.2% +6.4%
BOWEN, RICHARD L 1 80.7% +26.9%
CHAWAN, VIJAY B 1 87.9% +11.7%
KETEMA, BENYAM 1 66.0% +10.1%
MARIAM, DANIEL G 1 90.6% +10.3%
OSINSKI, MICHAEL S 1 75.6% +23.0%
SUN, ANDREW NMN 1 50.0% +100.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18968403 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND SEGMENTING OBJECTS FROM IMAGES MARIAM, DANIEL G —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19325058 IMAGE ENHANCEMENT IN A GENEALOGY SYSTEM DEPALMA, CAROLINE ELIZABETH —
19287330 RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED THOUGHT FOR AGENTIC MODELS BOWEN, RICHARD L —
19089960 GENERATING COREFERENCE MATCHES FOR AN ENTITY UTILIZING A COMBINED LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL CHAWAN, VIJAY B —
18952858 HANDWRITING RECOGNITION PIPELINES FOR GENEALOGICAL RECORDS OSINSKI, MICHAEL S —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19287330 RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED THOUGHT FOR AGENTIC MODELS BOWEN, RICHARD L —
19089960 GENERATING COREFERENCE MATCHES FOR AN ENTITY UTILIZING A COMBINED LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL CHAWAN, VIJAY B —
19080290 ARTIFICIAL REALITY FAMILY HISTORY EXPERIENCE KETEMA, BENYAM —
18968403 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND SEGMENTING OBJECTS FROM IMAGES MARIAM, DANIEL G —
18952858 HANDWRITING RECOGNITION PIPELINES FOR GENEALOGICAL RECORDS OSINSKI, MICHAEL S —
18939990 SUBCLUSTERING CONTENT ITEMS FOR ALLOCATING COMPUTATIONAL RESOURCES ON A PER-SUBCLUSTER BASIS SUN, ANDREW NMN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2675 2
2165 1
2658 1
2626 1
2674 1
2195 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19325058 IMAGE ENHANCEMENT IN A GENEALOGY SYSTEM DEPALMA, CAROLINE ELIZABETH 2675 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 10, 2025
19287330 RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED THOUGHT FOR AGENTIC MODELS BOWEN, RICHARD L 2165 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2025
19089960 GENERATING COREFERENCE MATCHES FOR AN ENTITY UTILIZING A COMBINED LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL CHAWAN, VIJAY B 2658 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2025
19080290 ARTIFICIAL REALITY FAMILY HISTORY EXPERIENCE KETEMA, BENYAM 2626 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2025
18968403 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND SEGMENTING OBJECTS FROM IMAGES MARIAM, DANIEL G 2675 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18952858 HANDWRITING RECOGNITION PIPELINES FOR GENEALOGICAL RECORDS OSINSKI, MICHAEL S 2674 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 19, 2024
18939990 SUBCLUSTERING CONTENT ITEMS FOR ALLOCATING COMPUTATIONAL RESOURCES ON A PER-SUBCLUSTER BASIS SUN, ANDREW NMN 2195 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2024

Managing Ancestry.com Operations Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ancestry.com Operations Inc. have?

Ancestry.com Operations Inc. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ancestry.com Operations Inc. applications?

Caroline Elizabeth Depalma has the most, with 1 of Ancestry.com Operations Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Ancestry.com Operations Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month