Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Andritz Perfojet SAS

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Andritz Perfojet SAS has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is assigned to ZHAO, AIYING, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending case. The prosecution is currently limited to a single art unit, reflecting a specialized focus for the active portfolio.

With a single distinct examiner handling the only active case, the company's prosecution progress is entirely dependent on this interaction. The small volume of the pending office action indicates a very specific or early-stage engagement within the mechanical engineering field. Success in this instance requires a direct and focused response to the specific examiner's concerns. The concentration of the workload suggests that the company is not currently pursuing a high volume of simultaneous applications in this technology area. This singular focus allows for an analysis of the examiner's previous rulings to optimize the chances of a favorable outcome.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ZHAO, AIYING 1 48.4% +42.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19273709 DEVICE FOR FORMING BY CARDING ONE OR MORE FLEECES OF FIBRES, IN PARTICULAR NON-WOVEN ZHAO, AIYING 7d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19273709 DEVICE FOR FORMING BY CARDING ONE OR MORE FLEECES OF FIBRES, IN PARTICULAR NON-WOVEN ZHAO, AIYING 3732 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Jul 18, 2025

Managing Andritz Perfojet SAS's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month