Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Andro Computational Solutions, LLC maintains 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the company's intellectual property is being evaluated by multiple specialized groups within the patent office.
CROSS, JULIANA MARIA is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners involved in total, the workload is split, as the busiest examiner handles 1 of the 2 pending office actions. This variety in examiners and art units suggests a broader technical range within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.
The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's innovations touch upon different regulatory or technical classifications. Managing 2 pending office actions requires coordination across different examination teams. This profile reflects a growing portfolio with diverse technical touchpoints in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CROSS, JULIANA MARIA | 1 | 82.5% | +18.4% |
| REDA, MATTHEW J | 1 | 54.9% | +28.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18596893 | MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AND COUNTERING NON-FRIENDLY RADAR NETWORKS | CROSS, JULIANA MARIA | 27d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17200106 | MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS AGENT OPERATING IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT | REDA, MATTHEW J | 46d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17200106 | MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS AGENT OPERATING IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT | REDA, MATTHEW J | 46d overdue |
| 18596893 | MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AND COUNTERING NON-FRIENDLY RADAR NETWORKS | CROSS, JULIANA MARIA | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3648 | 1 |
| 3665 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18596893 | MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AND COUNTERING NON-FRIENDLY RADAR NETWORKS | CROSS, JULIANA MARIA | 3648 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Mar 06, 2024 |
| 17200106 | MACHINE LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR CONTROL OF AUTONOMOUS AGENT OPERATING IN DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT | REDA, MATTHEW J | 3665 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 46d overdue | Pending | Mar 12, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial