Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Annalise-Ai Pty Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a highly concentrated prosecution footprint at this stage. The portfolio's activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a narrow technical focus for its current patenting efforts. Such concentration means the company's immediate success in this technology area depends on the specific examination standards of a single unit within the USPTO.
WINSTON III, EDWARD B serves as the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. This individual handles the entirety of the company's pending workload, as the busiest examiner pending count of 1 matches the total pending office actions. For practitioners, this indicates that prosecution strategy does not currently need to account for varying examiner behaviors across the portfolio. The alignment of 1 pending action with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit creates a streamlined but singular path for the company's current intellectual property objectives. This lack of examiner diversity means that the company's prosecution results are highly sensitive to the individual tendencies of WINSTON III, EDWARD B.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WINSTON III, EDWARD B | 1 | 19.8% | +31.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18705234 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL IMAGES WITH INJECTION OF CLINICAL RANKING | WINSTON III, EDWARD B | 56d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18705234 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL IMAGES WITH INJECTION OF CLINICAL RANKING | WINSTON III, EDWARD B | 56d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18705234 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL IMAGES WITH INJECTION OF CLINICAL RANKING | WINSTON III, EDWARD B | 3683 | §101 | Final Rejection | 56d overdue | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial