Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Antigravity (Sz) Technology Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Antigravity (Sz) Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to a distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This represents a concentrated and singular point of prosecution for the company's current patent activities.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT, who is managing the pending office action. Since there is only the pending action in the entire portfolio, this examiner is responsible for all current active review. The involvement of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area suggests that the subject matter is confined to a specific technical niche.

From a practitioner's perspective, the data shows a straightforward prosecution landscape. With the pending office action and CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT, the immediate success of the portfolio is tied to the decisions of the named examiner. There are no other examiners or art units currently involved to provide a broader context for the company's patent office interactions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 1 66.5% +48.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19176209 SHOOTING MECHANISM, UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19176209 SHOOTING MECHANISM, UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 3663 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 11, 2025

Managing Antigravity (Sz) Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month