Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Anymedi Inc.

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Anymedi Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This prosecution activity is handled by 1 distinct examiner, indicating a singular point of contact for the company's current legal matters. Interestingly, the data reports 0 distinct art units associated with this activity, which may reflect a specific administrative status or a unique classification phase for the pending application. The focus of the company's current efforts remains entirely on this single outstanding action.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is KOROMA, SORIE IBRAHIM, who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is 1 distinct examiner involved, KOROMA, SORIE IBRAHIM is responsible for the company's pending workload. This concentration means that the outcome of the current prosecution efforts rests with the decisions and review process of this one individual. The relationship between the examiner's pending load and the total pending actions underscores the narrow scope of the current portfolio.

Practitioners managing the portfolio must tailor their approach specifically to the preferences and requirements of the busiest examiner. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, there is no diversification of examiner perspective across the portfolio. The presence of 0 distinct art units further emphasizes the unique or highly focused nature of the current prosecution environment for the company and its 1 busiest examiner pending action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KOROMA, SORIE IBRAHIM 1 — —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18201576 METHOD FOR PROVIDING SURGICAL IMPLANT KOROMA, SORIE IBRAHIM — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 24, 2023

Managing Anymedi Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month