Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Anywire Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Communications technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, and the portfolio's current activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit. MALEK, LEILA is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action.
While the company works with 2 distinct examiners, the focus on 1 distinct art unit suggests the pending matters are in a similar technical field. This concentration within the art unit allows for a more unified technical strategy, even though different examiners are reviewing the 2 pending office actions. MALEK, LEILA is responsible for the pending office action, which is half of the company's total pending workload in the Communications sector.
The involvement of distinct examiners means that the company must adapt to different individual review styles. However, the 1 distinct art unit ensures that the underlying technical standards remain consistent. Practitioners should carefully monitor the pending office action assigned to MALEK, LEILA, as well as the action handled by the other examiner, to ensure that arguments remain cohesive within the single art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALEK, LEILA | 1 | 79.9% | +7.6% |
| TSE, YOUNG TOI | 1 | 89.3% | +8.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18873379 | CONTROL AND MONITORING SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | TSE, YOUNG TOI | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2632 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18879471 | CONTROL AND MONITORING SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | MALEK, LEILA | 2632 | §112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 27, 2024 |
| 18873379 | CONTROL AND MONITORING SIGNAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | TSE, YOUNG TOI | 2632 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Dec 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial