Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Aondevices Inc.

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Aondevices Inc. holds a company patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio currently features 3 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. The busiest examiner for the company is SCHALLHORN, TYLER J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This means that each of the 3 distinct examiners is handling a portion of the pending matters.

The distribution across 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's computing innovations are being reviewed by more than one technical group. Because there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, the prosecution outcomes are subject to the interpretations of multiple reviewers. For a practitioner, this spread suggests that the company's current patenting efforts are not centralized under a single individual. The presence of SCHALLHORN, TYLER J as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action shows how the current legal matters are divided. This data reflects the current state of the company's interactions with the patent office across 2 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SCHALLHORN, TYLER J 1 35.6% +14.8%
HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH 1 54.5% +57.5%
NGUYEN, MAIKHANH 1 87.2% +29.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17450398 ADAPTIVE TUNING PARAMETERS FOR A CLASSIFICATION NEURAL NETWORK NGUYEN, MAIKHANH 62d
17703969 END-TO-END ADAPTIVE DEEP LEARNING TRAINING AND INFERENCE METHOD AND TOOL CHAIN TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE AND SHORTEN DEVELOPMENT CYCLES HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17450398 ADAPTIVE TUNING PARAMETERS FOR A CLASSIFICATION NEURAL NETWORK NGUYEN, MAIKHANH 62d
18477763 RECOGNITION OF USER-DEFINED PATTERNS AT EDGE DEVICES WITH A HYBRID REMOTE-LOCAL PROCESSING SCHALLHORN, TYLER J —
17703969 END-TO-END ADAPTIVE DEEP LEARNING TRAINING AND INFERENCE METHOD AND TOOL CHAIN TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE AND SHORTEN DEVELOPMENT CYCLES HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2144 2
2143 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18477763 RECOGNITION OF USER-DEFINED PATTERNS AT EDGE DEVICES WITH A HYBRID REMOTE-LOCAL PROCESSING SCHALLHORN, TYLER J 2144 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 29, 2023
17703969 END-TO-END ADAPTIVE DEEP LEARNING TRAINING AND INFERENCE METHOD AND TOOL CHAIN TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE AND SHORTEN DEVELOPMENT CYCLES HWANG, MEGAN ELIZABETH 2143 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 24, 2022
17450398 ADAPTIVE TUNING PARAMETERS FOR A CLASSIFICATION NEURAL NETWORK NGUYEN, MAIKHANH 2144 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 62d Pending Oct 08, 2021

Managing Aondevices Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month