Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Aortic Solutions Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Aortic Solutions Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This workload is distributed across 3 distinct examiners, indicating a broad spread of technical review for the portfolio. The alignment of 1 examiner per pending action suggests that the company is navigating diverse patent paths simultaneously rather than facing a concentrated bottleneck with a single official.

Examiner JAFFRI, ZEHRA is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 3 and the busiest examiner only handles 1, the portfolio exhibits a decentralized prosecution structure. This lack of examiner concentration can be beneficial for risk management, as the outcome of an application is less likely to be influenced by the specific tendencies of a single examiner across the entire set.

The presence of 3 distinct art units further confirms that the pending office actions involve varied technological classifications. Practitioners should note that this distribution requires familiarity with the specific procedural nuances of different administrative sections within the patent office. Managing examiners across 3 art units for the current pending actions represents a high level of institutional variety relative to the total volume of active prosecution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
2
Medium (67%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JAFFRI, ZEHRA 1 58.0% +49.1%
LANCASTER, LINDSAY REGAN 1 53.3% +21.5%
ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 1 62.2% +23.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18379390 SURGICAL SYSTEM FOR AN AORTIC VALVE JAFFRI, ZEHRA 13d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17782238 CATHETER ASSEMBLY AND RELATED METHODS ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 38d overdue
18379390 SURGICAL SYSTEM FOR AN AORTIC VALVE JAFFRI, ZEHRA 13d
18285764 EXCISION CATHETER SYSTEM FOR AN AORTIC VALVE LANCASTER, LINDSAY REGAN 20d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3771 1
3794 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18379390 SURGICAL SYSTEM FOR AN AORTIC VALVE JAFFRI, ZEHRA 3771 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 13d Pending Oct 12, 2023
18285764 EXCISION CATHETER SYSTEM FOR AN AORTIC VALVE LANCASTER, LINDSAY REGAN 3794 §103 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Oct 05, 2023
17782238 CATHETER ASSEMBLY AND RELATED METHODS ALEMAN, SARAH WEBB 3774 §103 Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Jun 03, 2022

Managing Aortic Solutions Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Aortic Solutions Inc. have?

Aortic Solutions Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Aortic Solutions Inc. applications?

Zehra Jaffri has the most, with 1 of Aortic Solutions Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Aortic Solutions Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month