Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Apalta Patents Ou currently manages 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the current patent office interaction is focused on a technical niche. This organization characterizes the Chemistry & Materials portfolio.
RASHID, FAZLE A is the busiest examiner for this company. This individual is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner handles the active examination for the portfolio. This concentration allows for dialogue between the applicant and the examiner.
The 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner involved indicate a centralized prosecution path. For a practitioner, the outcome of the 1 pending office action will impact the standing of the Apalta Patents Ou portfolio. The focus remains on the matters before RASHID, FAZLE A. This examiner manages the 1 busiest examiner pending action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RASHID, FAZLE A | 1 | 55.8% | +48.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18191964 | INJECTOR SYSTEM FOR EXTRUDER EQUIPMENT | RASHID, FAZLE A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1748 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18191964 | INJECTOR SYSTEM FOR EXTRUDER EQUIPMENT | RASHID, FAZLE A | 1748 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial