Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Aplusx Inc.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Aplusx Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the company's current prosecution activity is concentrated in one specific area of the USPTO.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is COHEN, YARON, who is handling 1 pending office action. As there is only a single pending office action in total, this examiner is responsible for all current active matters for the company. This concentration allows for a prosecution strategy that is entirely focused on the requirements of this single examiner and the 1 distinct art unit involved.

With the current pending office action, the company's administrative needs are limited to this one matter. The focus on 1 distinct examiner means that the company does not need to manage different examiner styles or varying art unit procedures at this time. The outcome of this 1 pending office action will be the primary indicator of the company's current success in the Communications sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COHEN, YARON 1 69.0% +24.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19435032 CONTACT-TYPE INPUT DEVICE INCLUDING NON-CONTACT INPUT MODULE COHEN, YARON —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19435032 CONTACT-TYPE INPUT DEVICE INCLUDING NON-CONTACT INPUT MODULE COHEN, YARON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2626 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19435032 CONTACT-TYPE INPUT DEVICE INCLUDING NON-CONTACT INPUT MODULE COHEN, YARON 2626 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 29, 2025

Managing Aplusx Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month