Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days
Apothecary Products, LLC has 1 pending office action currently under review. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DAVISON, LAURA L, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending matter. The portfolio is active in 1 distinct art unit.
The presence of 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner indicates a focused prosecution effort. Because the activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the company's current patent office interaction is localized. The outcome of the 1 pending office action depends entirely on the examination by DAVISON, LAURA L. This data set reflects a minimal prosecution footprint, with no additional examiners or art units available to provide a comparative baseline for prosecution efficiency. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of this 1 examiner to ensure the successful progression of the portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAVISON, LAURA L | 1 | 32.6% | +36.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18762295 | Device for Pulling Nose and Ear Hair | DAVISON, LAURA L | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18762295 | Device for Pulling Nose and Ear Hair | DAVISON, LAURA L | 3d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3993 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18762295 | Device for Pulling Nose and Ear Hair | DAVISON, LAURA L | 3993 | §102§103Other | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Jul 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial