Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Appian Corporation

Technology area: Computing & Software

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Appian Corporation has 3 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These matters are assigned to 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. TORGRIMSON, TYLER J is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 pending office action.

The 3 pending office actions are evenly distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units. This reflects a perfectly distributed workload where each of the 3 pending office actions is handled by a different examiner. Practitioners must navigate 3 separate examiner styles to resolve the current pending matters within the Computing & Software sector.

The use of 3 distinct art units for 3 pending office actions suggests a lack of examiner concentration. Because TORGRIMSON, TYLER J only manages 1 pending office action, no single examiner's tendencies dominate the portfolio. This variety requires a flexible prosecution approach to accommodate the distinct procedural tendencies of 3 different examiners across 3 different art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
3
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TORGRIMSON, TYLER J 1 72.9% +10.6%
DAO, THUY CHAN 1 88.4% +11.7%
BOURZIK, BRAHIM 1 63.8% +44.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18435137 System and methods for Generating Objects in Low-Code or No-Code Software Process Execution Environments BOURZIK, BRAHIM 25d overdue
18913384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS DAO, THUY CHAN —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18435137 System and methods for Generating Objects in Low-Code or No-Code Software Process Execution Environments BOURZIK, BRAHIM 25d overdue
18927383 TRAINING CUSTOMIZABLE MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS TO EFFECTIVELY PROCESS DOCUMENTS TORGRIMSON, TYLER J —
18913384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS DAO, THUY CHAN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2165 1
2192 1
2191 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18927383 TRAINING CUSTOMIZABLE MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS TO EFFECTIVELY PROCESS DOCUMENTS TORGRIMSON, TYLER J 2165 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18913384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS DAO, THUY CHAN 2192 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18435137 System and methods for Generating Objects in Low-Code or No-Code Software Process Execution Environments BOURZIK, BRAHIM 2191 §101§103 Final Rejection 25d overdue Pending Feb 07, 2024

Managing Appian Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Appian Corporation have?

Appian Corporation has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Appian Corporation applications?

Tyler J Torgrimson has the most, with 1 of Appian Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Appian Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month