Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Appian Corporation

Technology areas: Networking & Security • Communications

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 1 of 4 (25%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Appian Corporation currently maintains 4 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These matters are distributed among 4 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This indicates that while the technical focus is relatively concentrated within two specific groups, the individual reviews are being conducted by four different examiners, ensuring a variety of perspectives on the company's applications.

TORGRIMSON, TYLER J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since there are 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for exactly 1 case. This lack of concentration among examiners suggests that the company's current prosecution is not dependent on any single individual's review, even within the 2 distinct art units involved.

Practitioners should note that the 4 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct art units, which may offer some opportunities for technical consistency. However, the involvement of 4 distinct examiners requires a coordinated effort to ensure that arguments remain aligned across the Communications portfolio. With TORGRIMSON, TYLER J and the other examiners each handling 1 pending office action, a broad approach to prosecution management is necessary.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
1
Communications
25% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TORGRIMSON, TYLER J 1 72.9% +10.6%
DAO, THUY CHAN 1 88.3% +11.8%
SERROU, ABDELALI 1 74.2% +29.8%
GEE, JASON KAI YIN 1 77.5% +23.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18732822 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL PROMPT GENERATION AND STRUCTURING SERROU, ABDELALI 2d overdue
18913384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS DAO, THUY CHAN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18732822 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL PROMPT GENERATION AND STRUCTURING SERROU, ABDELALI 2d overdue
18927383 TRAINING CUSTOMIZABLE MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS TO EFFECTIVELY PROCESS DOCUMENTS TORGRIMSON, TYLER J —
18913384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS DAO, THUY CHAN —
18593555 RULE-BASED PARTICULARIZED DATA SECURITY GEE, JASON KAI YIN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2659 1
2495 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18927383 TRAINING CUSTOMIZABLE MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS TO EFFECTIVELY PROCESS DOCUMENTS TORGRIMSON, TYLER J — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 25, 2024
18913384 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXECUTION IN DYNAMIC APPLICATION RUNTIME ENVIRONMENTS DAO, THUY CHAN — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18732822 LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL PROMPT GENERATION AND STRUCTURING SERROU, ABDELALI 2659 §101§103 Final Rejection 2d overdue AI Ready Jun 04, 2024
18593555 RULE-BASED PARTICULARIZED DATA SECURITY GEE, JASON KAI YIN 2495 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 01, 2024

Managing Appian Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month