Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
AppLand Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. These actions involve 2 distinct examiners but are both assigned to 1 distinct art unit. This concentration within a single art unit suggests a focused technical scope for the company's software-related patent applications. Because all pending matters are within 1 distinct art unit, the company can expect a relatively uniform application of examination guidelines for its computing technologies. This environment helps in predicting the types of rejections or requirements that might arise during the prosecution process.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is LEE, MARINA, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This represents a portion of the 2 pending office actions currently active. Having 2 distinct examiners means the company is interacting with multiple individuals, yet the 1 distinct art unit ensures they remain within the same administrative framework. This balance allows the applicant to gain insights from different examiners while benefiting from the specialized knowledge of the single art unit in the Computing & Software field. The outcome of these interactions will be critical for the company's intellectual property position.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, MARINA | 1 | 85.8% | +17.9% |
| GOORAY, MARK A | 1 | 76.0% | +62.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18893257 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGENT THAT LEVERAGES APPLICATION BEHAVIORAL MODELS | LEE, MARINA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18421243 | RESOLUTION OF CODEBASE COMPLICATIONS VIA FOUNDATION MODEL INTEGRATION | GOORAY, MARK A | 66d overdue |
| 18893257 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGENT THAT LEVERAGES APPLICATION BEHAVIORAL MODELS | LEE, MARINA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2199 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18893257 | SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AGENT THAT LEVERAGES APPLICATION BEHAVIORAL MODELS | LEE, MARINA | — | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 23, 2024 |
| 18421243 | RESOLUTION OF CODEBASE COMPLICATIONS VIA FOUNDATION MODEL INTEGRATION | GOORAY, MARK A | 2199 | §103 | Final Rejection | 66d overdue | Pending | Jan 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial