Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Aquarius Limited

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Aquarius Limited currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, concentrating the applicant's current prosecution activity on a single point of contact. The absence of a listed technology area suggests a focused or perhaps non-traditional filing that is being handled by a single official at the patent office.

The busiest examiner for the portfolio is KEYWORTH, PETER, who is managing 1 pending office action. Because this 1 action represents the total pending workload for the applicant, the examiner's individual throughput and review style will be the primary factors in the portfolio's immediate progress. With 1 pending action and 1 distinct examiner, the applicant can focus their legal strategy on the specific feedback provided by this one individual without competing priorities within their own portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEYWORTH, PETER 1 58.3% +23.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18834193 Waste Water Treatment to Remove Fat, Oil, and Grease KEYWORTH, PETER —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18834193 Waste Water Treatment to Remove Fat, Oil, and Grease KEYWORTH, PETER —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18834193 Waste Water Treatment to Remove Fat, Oil, and Grease KEYWORTH, PETER — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 29, 2024

Managing Aquarius Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month