Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd. is currently managing 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split across 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's material science innovations are being evaluated under different sets of examination guidelines. The involvement of multiple distinct examiners further indicates that the portfolio's current workload is distributed rather than centralized. This arrangement requires the applicant to maintain a flexible prosecution strategy that can adapt to the specific requirements of multiple examining groups.

MOWLA, GOLAM is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned. Since the total volume of active matters is divided, the prosecution strategy must be flexible enough to address the potentially different perspectives of separate examiners. The presence of multiple art units within the Chemistry & Materials sector may imply that the technologies involve different chemical processes or material applications. Practitioners should prepare for varied feedback, as the assigned officials may prioritize different aspects of patentability.

Managing these pending office actions requires a dual-track approach to satisfy the specific requirements of each art unit. Because there is no single point of contact for the portfolio's active matters, the strategy for responding to office actions must be tailored to the specific preferences of each individual. This level of examiner diversity provides multiple opportunities for the applicant to secure patent protection through different channels. Successfully navigating these distinct art units will be essential for the continued growth of the portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOWLA, GOLAM 1 62.1% +28.0%
MUDD, HENRY HOOPER 1 70.0% +24.5%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18550022 PHOTOVOLTAIC SUPPORT SPINDLE AND PHOTOVOLTAIC TRACKING SUPPORT MOWLA, GOLAM —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18550022 PHOTOVOLTAIC SUPPORT SPINDLE AND PHOTOVOLTAIC TRACKING SUPPORT MOWLA, GOLAM —
18268606 TORQUE TUBE WITH PENTAGONAL CROSS-SECTION AND SOLAR STRUCTURE MUDD, HENRY HOOPER —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1721 1
3642 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18550022 PHOTOVOLTAIC SUPPORT SPINDLE AND PHOTOVOLTAIC TRACKING SUPPORT MOWLA, GOLAM 1721 §102§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 11, 2023
18268606 TORQUE TUBE WITH PENTAGONAL CROSS-SECTION AND SOLAR STRUCTURE MUDD, HENRY HOOPER 3642 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 21, 2023

Managing Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd. have?

Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd. applications?

Golam Mowla has the most, with 1 of Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Arctech Solar Holding Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month