Technology area: Networking & Security
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days
Arctic Wolf Networks, Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Networking & Security technology area. These actions are spread across 2 distinct art units, which indicates that each of the company's pending matters falls into a different technical classification. The company is currently working with 2 distinct examiners, meaning that no two pending actions are being reviewed by the same person. This variety in both art units and examiners suggests a diverse technical approach within the networking sector.
WILCOX, JAMES J is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Because there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each examiner is responsible for 1 case. The presence of 2 distinct art units for 2 actions suggests technical variety within the networking and security fields for this company. Practitioners should be prepared to navigate 2 different examiner styles and 2 different art unit environments to resolve these 2 pending matters. This lack of concentration means that strategies must be tailored to the specific requirements of each individual examiner and art unit involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (33%) |
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WILCOX, JAMES J | 1 | 70.0% | +61.4% |
| DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | 1 | 29.4% | +71.4% |
| SHINGLES, KRISTIE D | 1 | 82.1% | +13.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18787380 | CYBERSECURITY AI-DRIVEN WORKFLOW MODIFICATION | SHINGLES, KRISTIE D | 1d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19206337 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED PREDICTIVE CURATION OF CONTEXTUALIZATION STEPS FOR INVESTIGATING A SECURITY INCIDENT | WILCOX, JAMES J | — |
| 18827962 | AUTOMATED CYBERSECURITY MISCONFIGURATION DETECTION | DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18787380 | CYBERSECURITY AI-DRIVEN WORKFLOW MODIFICATION | SHINGLES, KRISTIE D | 1d overdue |
| 19206337 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED PREDICTIVE CURATION OF CONTEXTUALIZATION STEPS FOR INVESTIGATING A SECURITY INCIDENT | WILCOX, JAMES J | — |
| 18827962 | AUTOMATED CYBERSECURITY MISCONFIGURATION DETECTION | DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2439 | 1 |
| 2498 | 1 |
| 2453 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19206337 | TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED PREDICTIVE CURATION OF CONTEXTUALIZATION STEPS FOR INVESTIGATING A SECURITY INCIDENT | WILCOX, JAMES J | 2439 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 13, 2025 |
| 18827962 | AUTOMATED CYBERSECURITY MISCONFIGURATION DETECTION | DILUZIO, NICHOLAS JOSEPH | 2498 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 09, 2024 |
| 18787380 | CYBERSECURITY AI-DRIVEN WORKFLOW MODIFICATION | SHINGLES, KRISTIE D | 2453 | §103 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Jul 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialArctic Wolf Networks, Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.
James J Wilcox has the most, with 1 of Arctic Wolf Networks, Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Networking & Security (USPTO Tech Center 2400), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
