Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Aresia-Valenton

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Aresia-Valenton currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner working within a distinct art unit. The scope of current prosecution activity is limited to this specific case, which defines the company's active footprint in this technical sector. The company's engagement with the patent office is presently centered on this individual matter.

SINAKI, ARFAN Y is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the total number of active matters is limited, this examiner handles the entirety of the company's active patent prosecution. The outcome of the company's current efforts in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area rests with this specific examiner and the distinct art unit involved. This arrangement means that the prosecution strategy is tied to an individual point of contact within the regulatory framework.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SINAKI, ARFAN Y 1 79.0% +41.9%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19163282 AERONAUTICAL CONVEYING AND DROPPING DEVICE SINAKI, ARFAN Y —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3642 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19163282 AERONAUTICAL CONVEYING AND DROPPING DEVICE SINAKI, ARFAN Y 3642 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 08, 2025

Managing Aresia-Valenton's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month