Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Arka Energy Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single action is handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution is currently highly concentrated as all metrics reflect the same single pending matter. The busiest examiner identified for the portfolio is NGUYEN, PHU K. This examiner is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there is only 1 pending office action total, NGUYEN, PHU K manages the entirety of the company's current pending workload at the office.
For a practitioner, this means the current success of the Arka Energy Inc. portfolio in the Communications space depends entirely on the 1 distinct examiner assigned. There is no examiner diversity to mitigate the impact of a single individual's interpretation of the prior art. The focus within 1 distinct art unit ensures that the examination follows the specific guidelines of that technical group. With 1 pending office action, the company's immediate prosecution profile is simple and centralized under NGUYEN, PHU K.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, PHU K | 1 | 85.9% | +7.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18605274 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MODELING ROOF IN A GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION USING DIGITAL SURFACE MODEL DATA | NGUYEN, PHU K | 149d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2616 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18605274 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MODELING ROOF IN A GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION USING DIGITAL SURFACE MODEL DATA | NGUYEN, PHU K | 2616 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 149d overdue | Pending | Mar 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial