Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Arrow Products USA, LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, KLEIN, GABRIEL J, who is also the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending case. All prosecution activity is localized within 1 distinct art unit.
The data shows a highly centralized prosecution environment for the company. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, there is only one point of contact at the USPTO for the current portfolio. KLEIN, GABRIEL J, is responsible for the full pending workload. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit indicates that the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems filings are not spread across different technical divisions. This structure allows for a focused prosecution strategy that addresses the specific requirements of a single examiner and art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KLEIN, GABRIEL J | 1 | 65.9% | +24.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19222071 | MODULAR REACTION ROD WITH INTERCHANGEABLE HEAD FOR FIREARMS | KLEIN, GABRIEL J | 6d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19222071 | MODULAR REACTION ROD WITH INTERCHANGEABLE HEAD FOR FIREARMS | KLEIN, GABRIEL J | 6d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3641 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19222071 | MODULAR REACTION ROD WITH INTERCHANGEABLE HEAD FOR FIREARMS | KLEIN, GABRIEL J | 3641 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | May 29, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial