Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Artemis Technologies Limited

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Artemis Technologies Limited has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, meaning each matter is under the review of a separate individual. The portfolio also spans 2 distinct art units, which shows that the technical subject matter is divided between multiple administrative groups. This distribution of 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct examiners indicates no overlap in the current prosecution personnel.

The busiest examiner is ALI, LABIBAH ILMA, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action is a portion of the 2 pending office actions total. Since each of the 2 distinct examiners holds an action, the workload is distributed. The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the legal strategy may need to account for different technical benchmarks. The 1 busiest examiner pending office action for ALI, LABIBAH ILMA represents that examiner's current responsibility for this portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALI, LABIBAH ILMA 1 83.3% +0.0%
CREPEAU, JONATHAN 1 73.2% +17.4%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18128842 BATTERY SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD CREPEAU, JONATHAN 38d overdue
18821208 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STABILISING A VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY STRUCTURE ALI, LABIBAH ILMA —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18128842 BATTERY SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD CREPEAU, JONATHAN 38d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3667 1
1725 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18821208 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STABILISING A VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY STRUCTURE ALI, LABIBAH ILMA 3667 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18128842 BATTERY SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD CREPEAU, JONATHAN 1725 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 38d overdue Pending Mar 30, 2023

Managing Artemis Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Artemis Technologies Limited have?

Artemis Technologies Limited has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Artemis Technologies Limited applications?

Labibah Ilma Ali has the most, with 1 of Artemis Technologies Limited's pending office actions.

What technology area are Artemis Technologies Limited's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month