Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Artemis Technologies Limited has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, both of whom are in 1 distinct art unit. The presence of 2 distinct examiners in 1 distinct art unit shows that the company's current prosecution is technically concentrated despite being handled by different individuals for the 2 pending office actions. This allows the practitioner to focus on the specific standards of a single art unit while managing two examiner relationships.
ALI, LABIBAH ILMA is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 pending office action. Because there are 2 distinct examiners for the 2 pending office actions, the workload is distributed. However, since both examiners are located within the same art unit, the technical interpretations applied to the Chemistry & Materials applications are likely to be consistent. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit simplifies the technical management of the 2 pending office actions even as the company navigates the preferences of 2 distinct examiners.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALI, LABIBAH ILMA | 1 | 80.0% | +0.0% |
| CREPEAU, JONATHAN | 1 | 73.1% | +18.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18128842 | BATTERY SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD | CREPEAU, JONATHAN | 38d overdue |
| 18821208 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STABILISING A VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY STRUCTURE | ALI, LABIBAH ILMA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18128842 | BATTERY SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD | CREPEAU, JONATHAN | 38d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1725 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18821208 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STABILISING A VESSEL AGAINST A STATIONARY STRUCTURE | ALI, LABIBAH ILMA | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 30, 2024 |
| 18128842 | BATTERY SAFETY SYSTEM AND METHOD | CREPEAU, JONATHAN | 1725 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Mar 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial