Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Arterioscope Flexco

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Arterioscope Flexco has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a concentrated effort in a specific technical field for the company's current patenting activity.

The busiest examiner is YOON, CHANEL J, who holds the 1 pending office action. This indicates a focused prosecution effort with a single examiner at this time. Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific examination style of YOON, CHANEL J.

With 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current interaction with the patent office is streamlined. This structure minimizes the complexity of managing the portfolio, as there are no other active matters to coordinate. The company can dedicate its resources to resolving this single pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
YOON, CHANEL J 1 55.0% +40.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18714507 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AN AORTIC STATE YOON, CHANEL J —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18714507 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AN AORTIC STATE YOON, CHANEL J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18714507 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING AN AORTIC STATE YOON, CHANEL J 3791 §101§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 29, 2024

Managing Arterioscope Flexco's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month