Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
ArthroSave Holding B.V. is navigating the patent prosecution process within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action under review. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES, who is also designated as the busiest examiner for the portfolio.
The prosecution is concentrated within a distinct art unit, reflecting a highly focused technical scope for the current pending workload. Practitioners can observe that the entirety of the company's immediate patent office interaction is consolidated under a single examiner and art unit. This concentration means that the outcome of the current portfolio activity depends entirely on the specific examination standards of LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES and the practices of the individual art unit involved. This lack of examiner diversity suggests that the applicant's strategy is currently centered on a very specific set of technical claims.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | 1 | 73.7% | +29.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18239453 | System for Connecting a Connecting Device, in Particular a Distractor, to a Bone | LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | 120d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18239453 | System for Connecting a Connecting Device, in Particular a Distractor, to a Bone | LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | 120d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3619 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18239453 | System for Connecting a Connecting Device, in Particular a Distractor, to a Bone | LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES | 3619 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 120d overdue | Pending | Aug 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial