Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Arthur AI Inc. is managing 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. The company's current prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a singular focus in its interactions with the patent office. In the competitive field of artificial intelligence and software, this concentration suggests a very targeted intellectual property strategy. For the practitioner, this means that the immediate success of the company's patenting efforts is tied to a single point of review, with no other active matters to provide broader context or alternative paths to allowance.
The busiest examiner, SMITH, BRIAN M, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This figure matches the total of 1 pending office action for the portfolio, placing the current prosecution trajectory under the review of this individual examiner. Because the busiest examiner handles the only pending action, their specific feedback and requirements are the primary focus for the company's legal efforts. Successful prosecution will require a precise and effective response to this examiner's concerns, as there are no other pending actions to balance the portfolio's overall progress in the software sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMITH, BRIAN M | 1 | 52.5% | +36.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18413512 | MACHINE LEARNING MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | SMITH, BRIAN M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18413512 | MACHINE LEARNING MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | SMITH, BRIAN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2122 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18413512 | MACHINE LEARNING MONITORING SYSTEMS AND METHODS | SMITH, BRIAN M | 2122 | §101§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialArthur AI Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Brian M Smith has the most, with 1 of Arthur AI Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
