Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Artimelt AG is currently navigating 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit, concentrating the company's current legal efforts on a single front. The presence of 1 pending office action suggests a focused or emerging presence in this specific technology sector. Because 1 distinct examiner handles the entire pending workload, the prosecution outcome is highly dependent on the individual examiner's interpretation of the Chemistry & Materials art.
MANGOHIG, THOMAS A is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. This streamlined structure avoids the complexities of conflicting office actions from different art units. Practitioners should analyze the historical data for MANGOHIG, THOMAS A to determine the most effective response strategy for the 1 pending office action. The alignment of 1 distinct art unit with this examiner indicates a stable examination environment for the company's current filing.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | 1 | 20.0% | +24.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17911675 | BANDAGE, HOT-MELT ADHESIVE FOR PRODUCING A BANDAGE,USE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A HOT-MELT ADHESIVE | MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17911675 | BANDAGE, HOT-MELT ADHESIVE FOR PRODUCING A BANDAGE,USE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A HOT-MELT ADHESIVE | MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1788 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17911675 | BANDAGE, HOT-MELT ADHESIVE FOR PRODUCING A BANDAGE,USE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A HOT-MELT ADHESIVE | MANGOHIG, THOMAS A | 1788 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 15, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialArtimelt AG has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Thomas A Mangohig has the most, with 1 of Artimelt AG's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
