Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Arvinas Operations Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Arvinas Operations Inc. is overseeing 5 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are distributed among 5 distinct examiners, with each examiner handling exactly 1 matter. This distribution indicates that the active workload is spread evenly across the assigned personnel.

The portfolio's activity is spread across 4 distinct art units, showing a broad technical range within the biotech sector. The busiest examiner, SEAMAN, D MARGARET M, has 1 pending office action, which is the same workload as the other four examiners. This means that each of the 5 pending actions is being handled by a different individual.

The ratio of 5 examiners to 4 art units suggests that at least two examiners are working within the same technical group. However, the prosecution remains decentralized with five different individuals reviewing the five pending applications. Practitioners must manage interactions with five different examiners across these four distinct administrative units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
Double-patenting + other2 (40%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SEAMAN, D MARGARET M 1 76.6% +8.1%
MOU, LIYUAN 1 43.8% +59.9%
RAHMANI, NILOOFAR 1 77.6% -2.9%
KIFLE, BRUCK 1 79.3% +15.8%
RICCI, CRAIG D 1 53.7% +52.6%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18834785 DGK TARGETING COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOF SEAMAN, D MARGARET M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18456718 IMIDE-BASED MODULATORS OF PROTEOLYSIS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF USE RICCI, CRAIG D 99d overdue
18772066 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETED DEGRADATION OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR MOU, LIYUAN —
18669105 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETED DEGRADATION OF RAPIDLY ACCELERATED FIBROSARCOMA POLYPEPTIDES KIFLE, BRUCK —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1625 1
1628 1
1624 1
1611 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18834785 DGK TARGETING COMPOUNDS AND USES THEREOF SEAMAN, D MARGARET M 1625 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18772066 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETED DEGRADATION OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR MOU, LIYUAN 1628 §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18759774 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETED DEGRADATION OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR RAHMANI, NILOOFAR — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18669105 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR THE TARGETED DEGRADATION OF RAPIDLY ACCELERATED FIBROSARCOMA POLYPEPTIDES KIFLE, BRUCK 1624 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 20, 2024
18456718 IMIDE-BASED MODULATORS OF PROTEOLYSIS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS OF USE RICCI, CRAIG D 1611 §103 Final Rejection 99d overdue Pending Aug 28, 2023

Managing Arvinas Operations Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Arvinas Operations Inc. have?

Arvinas Operations Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Arvinas Operations Inc. applications?

D Margaret M Seaman has the most, with 1 of Arvinas Operations Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Arvinas Operations Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month