Technology area: Communications
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Arwall Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners. The prosecution spans 2 distinct art units, reflecting the technical distribution of the company's Communications filings. This distribution across 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's active matters are subject to the specific standards of those assigned art units at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This count of 1 pending office action for the busiest examiner is part of the total 2 pending office actions. With 2 distinct examiners involved, practitioners managing this portfolio must coordinate across individual examiner preferences. The fact that SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D handles this workload highlights the distribution of the current prosecution pipeline. This requires a strategy that accounts for the requirements of the 2 distinct examiners across the 2 distinct art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D | 1 | 72.4% | +27.1% |
| BADER, ROBERT N. | 1 | 44.8% | +25.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18611100 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTED VIRTUAL FILM PRODUCTION | BADER, ROBERT N. | 28d |
| 19000495 | AUGMENTED REALITY WALL WITH COMBINED VIEWER AND CAMERA TRACKING | SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2613 | 1 |
| 2611 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19000495 | AUGMENTED REALITY WALL WITH COMBINED VIEWER AND CAMERA TRACKING | SALVUCCI, MATTHEW D | 2613 | §103DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18611100 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AUGMENTED VIRTUAL FILM PRODUCTION | BADER, ROBERT N. | 2611 | §103 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Mar 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialArwall Inc. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Matthew D Salvucci has the most, with 1 of Arwall Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
