Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ascension Point Consulting LLC has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and a particular art unit, representing a focused prosecution effort. Such a concentration allows the company to direct its resources toward a specific set of claims and a specific point of contact at the patent office. The absence of multiple active matters simplifies the management of the company's intellectual property strategy.
BERGIN, JAMES S is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. As this is the only active matter for the company, the outcome of this specific examination will determine the immediate success of the company's current patent filings. The practitioner's primary goal is to resolve the concerns of this individual examiner to move the portfolio forward. Navigating the requirements of the 1 pending office action is the central task for the company's legal team at this time.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BERGIN, JAMES S | 1 | 79.4% | +10.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19295165 | ANTI-EQUIPMENT SHOTSHELL CARTRIDGE | BERGIN, JAMES S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19295165 | ANTI-EQUIPMENT SHOTSHELL CARTRIDGE | BERGIN, JAMES S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3641 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19295165 | ANTI-EQUIPMENT SHOTSHELL CARTRIDGE | BERGIN, JAMES S | 3641 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 08, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial