Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Aseptiscope, Inc. holds a patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The current prosecution status is defined by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This concentration indicates that the portfolio's active applications are focused within a specialized area of the USPTO.
KUMAR, RAKESH is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. Currently, there is 1 busiest examiner pending office action assigned to this examiner. This workload represents the total 1 pending office actions currently pending for the company.
The involvement of 1 distinct examiner means that the prosecution experience is consistent. Since the portfolio only spans 1 distinct art unit, the technical review is centralized. Addressing the 1 pending office action with KUMAR, RAKESH is the primary objective for advancing these Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems patents. The reliance on an individual examiner suggests that the prosecution strategy should be tailored to the specific feedback received in the outstanding matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, RAKESH | 1 | 57.2% | +28.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17840451 | CARTRIDGES, DISPENSERS, AND KITS FOR DISPENSING INSTRUMENT COVERS | KUMAR, RAKESH | 52d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17840451 | CARTRIDGES, DISPENSERS, AND KITS FOR DISPENSING INSTRUMENT COVERS | KUMAR, RAKESH | 52d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17840451 | CARTRIDGES, DISPENSERS, AND KITS FOR DISPENSING INSTRUMENT COVERS | KUMAR, RAKESH | 3651 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 52d overdue | Pending | Jun 14, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial