Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Aspire Technology Group Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners but are located within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while the company has multiple active cases, they are concentrated within a single specialized department of the patent office. For the applicant, this means that the 1 art unit involved will be the primary source of examination standards for these filings.
PANCHOLI, VISHAL J is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. This 1 action is part of the 2 total pending office actions for the company. Since there are 2 distinct examiners for the 2 pending actions, each examiner is currently responsible for 1 of the company's active office actions. This distribution ensures that the prosecution of the 2 cases is not dependent on the schedule or findings of a single examiner, even though they both operate within the same art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MELARAGNO, MICHAEL | 1 | 67.5% | +11.6% |
| PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | 1 | 72.8% | +25.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18988631 | PEROXIDE FOAM CONTAINER | MELARAGNO, MICHAEL | — |
| 18988660 | A CONTAINER | PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18988631 | PEROXIDE FOAM CONTAINER | MELARAGNO, MICHAEL | — |
| 18988660 | A CONTAINER | PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3754 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18988631 | PEROXIDE FOAM CONTAINER | MELARAGNO, MICHAEL | 3754 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2024 |
| 18988660 | A CONTAINER | PANCHOLI, VISHAL J | 3754 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAspire Technology Group Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
Michael Melaragno has the most, with 1 of Aspire Technology Group Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
