Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris maintains a patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio currently features 1 pending office action, which represents the sole focus of its active prosecution. This action is handled by 1 distinct examiner, COUNTS, GARY W, who is the only examiner currently assigned to the company's applications.

The activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's innovations in biotechnology or pharmaceuticals are being reviewed within a specific technical group. COUNTS, GARY W is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. This examiner's individual review will determine the immediate outcome for the pending matter.

Since there is only 1 pending office action, the busiest examiner's load represents the total active workload for the portfolio. This one-to-one relationship simplifies the management of the patenting process. Practitioners can concentrate their efforts on understanding the specific examination patterns of COUNTS, GARY W, as there are no other pending actions to consider. This centralized structure allows for a highly targeted prosecution strategy within the single art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
0
Medium (0%)
2
Easy (67%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (33%)
§112 only2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WARD, PAUL V 1 83.2% -12.2%
GIBBS, TERRA C 1 63.7% +10.3%
SIMMONS, VALERIE MICHELLE 1 28.9% +46.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18838160 AMILORIDE FOR USE IN THE TOPICAL TREATMENT OF SOMATOSENSORY IMPAIRMENTS WARD, PAUL V —

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17293602 METHOD FOR DETERMINING ONE CONTENT IN PROTEIN AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES AND METHODS SIMMONS, VALERIE MICHELLE —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18305809 METHODS FOR PERFORMING ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDE-MEDIATED EXON SKIPPING IN THE RETINA OF A SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF GIBBS, TERRA C 121d overdue
17293602 METHOD FOR DETERMINING ONE CONTENT IN PROTEIN AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES AND METHODS SIMMONS, VALERIE MICHELLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1635 1
1758 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18838160 AMILORIDE FOR USE IN THE TOPICAL TREATMENT OF SOMATOSENSORY IMPAIRMENTS WARD, PAUL V — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 13, 2024
18305809 METHODS FOR PERFORMING ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDE-MEDIATED EXON SKIPPING IN THE RETINA OF A SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF GIBBS, TERRA C 1635 §112 Final Rejection 121d overdue Pending Apr 24, 2023
17293602 METHOD FOR DETERMINING ONE CONTENT IN PROTEIN AND ASSOCIATED DEVICES AND METHODS SIMMONS, VALERIE MICHELLE 1758 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2021

Managing Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month