Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Atkins Nuclear Secured Holdings Corporation currently faces 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. Prosecution is limited to 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. This concentration suggests a focused interaction with the patent office for the current applications. The alignment with this technology area indicates the specific technical field of the company's active intellectual property efforts.
COOLEY, CHARLES E is the busiest examiner for the company, handling the only pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the total volume of pending office actions in the portfolio. Prosecution strategy should focus on the specific requirements and feedback provided by this examiner. Practitioners should review the examiner's past decisions to inform their response strategy. Advancing the company's patent position requires a successful resolution of the concerns raised by this individual.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COOLEY, CHARLES E | 1 | 79.0% | +15.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17907194 | MIXING ASSEMBLY HAVING AN ALIGNMENT DISH FOR A CONTAINER AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME | COOLEY, CHARLES E | 77d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17907194 | MIXING ASSEMBLY HAVING AN ALIGNMENT DISH FOR A CONTAINER AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME | COOLEY, CHARLES E | 77d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1774 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17907194 | MIXING ASSEMBLY HAVING AN ALIGNMENT DISH FOR A CONTAINER AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME | COOLEY, CHARLES E | 1774 | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 77d overdue | Pending | Sep 23, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial