Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Atlantic Inertial Systems Inc. currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 matter is being examined within 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the portfolio's current activity in this specific technology area and art unit suggests a focused approach to its pending intellectual property. This focus allows for a deep technical engagement within the 1 distinct art unit assigned to the case.
The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, JAGOLINZER, SCOTT ROSS. As the busiest examiner for the company, JAGOLINZER, SCOTT ROSS is responsible for 1 pending office action. This means the entirety of the company's active office action response requirements is centered on this 1 person. Having 1 distinct examiner for the pending matter simplifies the communication chain between the applicant and the patent office.
The data shows that with 1 pending action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current interaction with the patent office is highly localized. Practitioners managing this portfolio must address the specific requirements of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area as represented in this case. Success in this 1 distinct art unit is critical for the current state of the portfolio's active prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JAGOLINZER, SCOTT ROSS | 1 | 41.9% | +23.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18792898 | DIFFUSION MODEL TO GENERATE PREDICTIVE IMAGE INERTIAL NAVIGATION AIDING FOR A MOVING PLATFORM | JAGOLINZER, SCOTT ROSS | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3665 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18792898 | DIFFUSION MODEL TO GENERATE PREDICTIVE IMAGE INERTIAL NAVIGATION AIDING FOR A MOVING PLATFORM | JAGOLINZER, SCOTT ROSS | 3665 | §103 | Final Rejection | 2d overdue | Pending | Aug 02, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial