Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Atressa Global Corporation S L is managing 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. The portfolio's current activity involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a highly specialized and narrow focus for its intellectual property. This singular point of contact within the patent office suggests that the company's current communication claims are concentrated in 1 specific technical niche.
SMALL, NAOMI J is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action, accounting for all pending matters for the organization. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company's entire prosecution strategy is currently focused on satisfying the requirements of this 1 distinct examiner. This allows for a very targeted approach to the 1 distinct art unit involved, but it also means the company's immediate patent goals are subject to the specific interpretations of a single official. Practitioners should focus on the specific precedents and preferences of this examiner to resolve the pending matter efficiently within the communications field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMALL, NAOMI J | 1 | 63.9% | +23.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18701561 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ASSISTANCE IN VEHICLE ACCIDENTS | SMALL, NAOMI J | 2d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18701561 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ASSISTANCE IN VEHICLE ACCIDENTS | SMALL, NAOMI J | 2685 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 2d overdue | Pending | Apr 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial