Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Attack Industries, LLC has 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to a distinct examiner, COLLIER, JAMESON D, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a singular focus for the company's current patent activities. This alignment of the pending office action with 1 distinct art unit indicates a highly concentrated prosecution path.
With only a single pending office action and 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution workload is entirely focused on a single matter. This single point of contact in an art unit means that the outcome of their current medical device filing depends entirely on the review of COLLIER, JAMESON D. The presence of only 1 distinct examiner for the entire portfolio simplifies the management of their intellectual property but also concentrates the risk on a single official's decision.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLIER, JAMESON D | 1 | 54.2% | +47.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19275101 | AMERICAN FOOTBALL TRAINING GARMENT | COLLIER, JAMESON D | 38d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19275101 | AMERICAN FOOTBALL TRAINING GARMENT | COLLIER, JAMESON D | 38d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3732 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19275101 | AMERICAN FOOTBALL TRAINING GARMENT | COLLIER, JAMESON D | 3732 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 38d overdue | Pending | Jul 21, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial