Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Augmented Reality Concepts, Inc. is managing 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This active case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a prosecution profile for the company's current intellectual property efforts. The concentration in the 1 distinct art unit indicates a technical focus within the communications sector. This 1 distinct art unit will be the primary site for determining the patentability of the company's current claims.
The busiest examiner is TSENG, CHARLES, who has 1 pending office action. Because this is the 1 pending office action for the company, the examiner's review will determine the immediate success of the company's pending applications in the Communications field. The company's reliance on 1 distinct examiner for its 1 pending office action emphasizes the importance of this relationship. Practitioners must address the preferences of the 1 distinct examiner to move the portfolio forward.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSENG, CHARLES | 1 | 79.1% | +31.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18732900 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A 360-DEGREE PRESENTATION OF AN OBJECT | TSENG, CHARLES | 1d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18732900 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A 360-DEGREE PRESENTATION OF AN OBJECT | TSENG, CHARLES | 1d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2613 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18732900 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A 360-DEGREE PRESENTATION OF AN OBJECT | TSENG, CHARLES | 2613 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Jun 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial