Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Aura Technologie GmbH is currently navigating the patent process within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio shows 1 pending office action, representing the current workload for the company's legal representatives. This specific action indicates a focused prosecution phase for the company's intellectual property assets in this domain.
The prosecution is highly centralized, involving 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner. This concentration means that the company's current success in the Chemistry & Materials sector is tied to a specific point of evaluation within the patent office. Practitioners should note that this lack of variety in examiners simplifies the tracking of prosecution trends for this entity.
SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T is identified as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Since this individual is the 1 examiner listed, their approach will dictate the immediate trajectory of the company's patenting efforts. The alignment of SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T with the busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms the singular focus of the current prosecution cycle.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T | 1 | 79.2% | +0.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18014027 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECYCLING WASTE MATERIALS CONTAINING VALUABLE METALS | SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T | 14d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1774 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18014027 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RECYCLING WASTE MATERIALS CONTAINING VALUABLE METALS | SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T | 1774 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Dec 30, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial