Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Austin From Boston LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending action. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused technical review for the company's semiconductor or optics filings.
With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the current prosecution effort is highly centralized. OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B is the examiner responsible for the 1 pending action, meaning that the portfolio's immediate success depends on this individual's review. Counsel should analyze the 1 art unit's specific trends to better understand the examination environment for this Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics matter. The presence of 1 examiner for 1 pending action ensures that the legal strategy does not need to account for multiple examiner perspectives at this time. This centralized arrangement means that the outcome of the 1 action will define the portfolio's current status.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B | 1 | 54.5% | +19.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18198585 | MUFFLER SYSTEM WITH PNEUMATICALLY ACTUATED BYPASS VALVE | OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2837 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18198585 | MUFFLER SYSTEM WITH PNEUMATICALLY ACTUATED BYPASS VALVE | OLSON, JENNIFER MAR B | 2837 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | May 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial