Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Australian National University

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Australian National University currently manages 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This prosecution activity is limited to 1 distinct art unit and is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a highly specific area of current interest within the university's broader research and development efforts, specifically focused on communications technology. The use of 1 art unit suggests that the pending matter is well-defined within the patent office's classification system, rather than spanning multiple technical disciplines.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is DOBSON, DANIEL G, who is handling 1 pending office action. Since the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner is responsible for all current pending matters. This singular focus provides a clear point of contact for the university's current interactions with the patent office in this technology sector. For practitioners, this means that the university's immediate patent outcomes in communications are entirely dependent on the review process of this 1 examiner. The absence of other pending actions across different examiners or art units highlights the focused nature of the university's current active prosecution in this specific field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DOBSON, DANIEL G 1 81.7% +7.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18691450 SYSTEMS AND METHODS/PROCESSES FOR OPTICAL INTERFEROMETRIC SENSING DOBSON, DANIEL G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18691450 SYSTEMS AND METHODS/PROCESSES FOR OPTICAL INTERFEROMETRIC SENSING DOBSON, DANIEL G 2634 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 12, 2024

Managing Australian National University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month