Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

10 pending office actions • 10 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 65 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd. has 11 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 11 distinct examiners and 11 distinct art units, meaning each listed action has a separate examiner and technical-group assignment.

BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The profile provides no basis for examiner-specific portfolio concentration. Application-level review and consistent treatment of related technology are the principal prosecution considerations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
3
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (60%)
3
Medium (30%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (10%)
§101 + other2 (20%)
§103 only3 (30%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
3
Communications
30% of docket
3
Semiconductors
30% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW 1 90.5% +6.4%
RHEE, ROY B 1 70.3% +21.7%
BROSH, BENJAMIN J 1 71.3% +27.2%
JUSTICE, MICHAEL W 1 83.3% +16.3%
SUN, HAI TAO 1 73.6% +24.0%
YENTRAPATI, AVINASH 1 75.0% -4.3%
KHAN, USMAN A 1 75.0% +11.8%
PARCO JR, RUBEN C 1 46.2% +16.1%
YOUNG, MONICA S 1 74.9% +32.5%
QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 1 53.3% +34.2%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069196 Method for Measuring Battery Reserve Capacity of Storage Battery, and Battery Detection Device QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 63d
19392016 CONTROL METHOD BASED ON UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEM AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEM BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW —
18648851 RADAR SPEED MEASUREMENT METHOD, RADAR, RADAR SPEED MEASUREMENT DEVICE JUSTICE, MICHAEL W —
18627605 TARGET LABELING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM SUN, HAI TAO —
18535405 FOCUSING METHOD, FOCUSING DEVICE, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE KHAN, USMAN A —
18900627 CLAMPING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING CURVE OF STROKE CURVE PROTRUSION IN CLAMPING DEVICE YOUNG, MONICA S —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18069196 Method for Measuring Battery Reserve Capacity of Storage Battery, and Battery Detection Device QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 63d
17938716 INERTIAL MEASUREMENT MODULE, SHOCK ABSORPTION SYSTEM, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PARCO JR, RUBEN C 72d
19004356 ANTI-SATURATION CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE BASED ON LEAD CORRECTION RHEE, ROY B —
18761113 PATROL TARGET DETECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM BROSH, BENJAMIN J —
18648851 RADAR SPEED MEASUREMENT METHOD, RADAR, RADAR SPEED MEASUREMENT DEVICE JUSTICE, MICHAEL W —
18627605 TARGET LABELING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM SUN, HAI TAO —
18535405 FOCUSING METHOD, FOCUSING DEVICE, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE KHAN, USMAN A —
18900627 CLAMPING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING CURVE OF STROKE CURVE PROTRUSION IN CLAMPING DEVICE YOUNG, MONICA S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3647 1
3664 1
3658 1
3648 1
2616 1
2672 1
2637 1
2853 1
2855 1
2857 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19392016 CONTROL METHOD BASED ON UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEM AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEM BONNETTE, RODNEY ANDREW 3647 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2025
19004356 ANTI-SATURATION CONTROL METHOD AND DEVICE FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE BASED ON LEAD CORRECTION RHEE, ROY B 3664 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 29, 2024
18761113 PATROL TARGET DETECTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM BROSH, BENJAMIN J 3658 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024
18648851 RADAR SPEED MEASUREMENT METHOD, RADAR, RADAR SPEED MEASUREMENT DEVICE JUSTICE, MICHAEL W 3648 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 29, 2024
18627605 TARGET LABELING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM SUN, HAI TAO 2616 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 05, 2024
18622367 METHOD, APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR DETERMINING ALTERNATE LANDING AREA YENTRAPATI, AVINASH 2672 §103 Final Rejection 39d Pending Mar 29, 2024
18535405 FOCUSING METHOD, FOCUSING DEVICE, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE KHAN, USMAN A 2637 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 11, 2023
17938716 INERTIAL MEASUREMENT MODULE, SHOCK ABSORPTION SYSTEM, AND UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE PARCO JR, RUBEN C 2853 §103 Non-Final OA 72d Pending Oct 07, 2022
18900627 CLAMPING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING CURVE OF STROKE CURVE PROTRUSION IN CLAMPING DEVICE YOUNG, MONICA S 2855 §101§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2024
18069196 Method for Measuring Battery Reserve Capacity of Storage Battery, and Battery Detection Device QUIGLEY, KYLE ROBERT 2857 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 63d Pending Dec 20, 2022

Managing Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd. have?

Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd. has 10 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 10 art units and 10 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd. applications?

Rodney Andrew Bonnette has the most, with 1 of Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Autel Intelligent Technology Corp., Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month