Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Authgrip Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This case is assigned to the distinct examiner, REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR, and is situated within the distinct art unit. REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This creates the centralized prosecution environment where the official oversees the company's entire pending workload. The involvement of the art unit suggests that the company's innovation is concentrated within the specific technical classification.
With the pending office action and the examiner, the applicant cannot leverage insights from other active cases to inform the strategy. Instead, the practitioner must focus on the specific feedback provided by REGINALD S TILLMAN, JR. The Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area often involves complex mechanical or systemic claims that require precise technical advocacy. For Authgrip Inc., the outcome of the pending office action is the determinant of its current prosecution success.
Because there is the distinct examiner and the art unit, the prosecution strategy is streamlined. Practitioners should prioritize the thorough understanding of the specific guidelines for the technology area. Effectively addressing the concerns of the official is the primary objective for this portfolio. The company's efforts are focused on advancing the application toward allowance.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S | 1 | 77.8% | +11.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19095744 | UNIVERSAL TRIGGER LOCKING SYSTEM | TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19095744 | UNIVERSAL TRIGGER LOCKING SYSTEM | TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3641 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19095744 | UNIVERSAL TRIGGER LOCKING SYSTEM | TILLMAN, JR, REGINALD S | 3641 | §101Other | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Mar 31, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial