Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Automated Cost Tracking Solutions LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, STEWART, CRYSTOL, who also serves as the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending case. This 1 to 1 ratio between pending actions and distinct examiners suggests a highly concentrated prosecution front where the company's immediate patent goals are tied to 1 individual's review.
The data shows 1 distinct art unit involved in current proceedings, indicating that the portfolio's active matter is technically localized within a specific division of the USPTO. For a practitioner, the presence of only 1 pending office action under STEWART, CRYSTOL means that prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the individual tendencies and past decisions of this 1 examiner. The lack of diversity in art units or examiners simplifies the administrative burden but increases the impact of 1 examiner's perspective on the company's intellectual property strategy. Success in this matter requires a deep understanding of the specific examination standards prevalent in this 1 art unit, as there are no other active cases to provide broader context.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STEWART, CRYSTOL | 1 | 33.6% | +28.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19150803 | WORK LOCATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | STEWART, CRYSTOL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19150803 | WORK LOCATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | STEWART, CRYSTOL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19150803 | WORK LOCATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | STEWART, CRYSTOL | 3624 | §101§102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 24, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialAutomated Cost Tracking Solutions LLC has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Crystol Stewart has the most, with 1 of Automated Cost Tracking Solutions LLC's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
