Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Autotech Engineering S L

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Autotech Engineering S L maintains 2 pending office actions focused in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Although these matters are handled by 2 distinct examiners, they are consolidated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests a technical focus for the portfolio's current filings, even as different individuals review the applications.

The busiest examiner, O'NEILL, MATTHEW JAMES, is currently assigned 1 pending action. This indicates that the workload is divided equally between the 2 distinct examiners. For the practitioner, the use of 1 distinct art unit may allow for a unified strategy regarding prior art and examiner tendencies within that specific group, despite the involvement of multiple examiners like O'NEILL, MATTHEW JAMES. Having both actions in the unit provides a centralized point for understanding the technical standards applied to the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems filings. This structure may simplify the management of the 2 pending office actions by limiting the variety of art unit policies the company must navigate.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
33% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
O'NEILL, MATTHEW JAMES 1 79.1% +22.9%
PAPE, JOSEPH 1 88.3% +3.8%
ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS 1 87.0% +8.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19099926 A VEHICLE STRUCTURE ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19112742 UNITARY REAR RAIL STRUCTURE FOR A VEHICLE AND METHODS O'NEILL, MATTHEW JAMES 9d overdue
19067104 VEHICLE STRUCTURE PAPE, JOSEPH —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19112742 UNITARY REAR RAIL STRUCTURE FOR A VEHICLE AND METHODS O'NEILL, MATTHEW JAMES 9d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3614 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19112742 UNITARY REAR RAIL STRUCTURE FOR A VEHICLE AND METHODS O'NEILL, MATTHEW JAMES 3614 §102§103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2025
19067104 VEHICLE STRUCTURE PAPE, JOSEPH — §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 28, 2025
19099926 A VEHICLE STRUCTURE ACOSTA, ERIC LAZARUS — §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 30, 2025

Managing Autotech Engineering S L's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month